ExSampled Out
original:
"Eine Gruppe von Menschen wird immer
nach ihren auffälligsten Subjekten beurteilt"
translated:
"Any group of people gets always seen by
the views about theirs being noticed most".
(seen = estimated/judged, view = image/impression)
The Making Of
This (not yet famous) wording is mine AFAIR - it based on two major
sources both back at the end of the 1990ies and assembled by me into
a compact format that transpires a lot of different philosophical
levels. Try to discuss the sides on a party, everyone has another
note to make about what's in it.
The first source is about the internet hype of the late 1990ies
and research about attention management. In that time the effects
of advertisement were evaluated in the light of the modern web
technology. And the internet startups were given great wealths
of money - which they did burn quickly as we remember. However,
we have been noticed about the relationship of actual impressions
and the derived judgement about the whole category of the topic
of a group of advertisers. It turns out that impressions are
weighted differently where some can overshadow others even when
showed/told fewer times but more "sensational".
The second source goes to prejudice and ethnic conflicts in
schools in northern germany. The speaker has already picked up
some of the (widely known) features of "attention" mechanisms.
It was known before that young people are always trouble makers
in a way and they draw their actions generally on the most easy
targets - which was dubbed "outsiders" in the research before.
With the "attention" research at hand we know that it need not
be a single person - even a whole group can be marked "outside"
of one's own group. And marked with colorful attributions that
might diverge from the actual impressions seen.
Hints
- Group of Groups
- It is unimportant whether the "membership" to a group is
self-declared, lawfully assigned, given my visible / audible
marks (incl. cloth), or parts of the C.V. heard or read
(incl. birthname). Something else to group people into?
- Ranking an Impression
- The impression must be ranked high enough to atleast reach the
state of gossip / hearsay / rumours / untestified news. The reasons
are manifold. In general it is remarkable different to a comparison
"non-group", mostly you and your self-esteemed group assignment(s).
There is no strict relation of creating the rank as to just
the absolute time or just the absolute count of the
impression(s). Higher ranks are spread more swiftly and remembered
longer?
- Statistics and Rules
- Humans have the tendency to overrate reoccurrences and making
them into rules of reoccurrence. They inject reasoning and
"hidden cause" to a known correlation in a statistics view.
They project the data and assume a model behind it. Still the
sciences say that a correlation of two scales is just a correlation
a correlation fo two scales - which has no "direction" between them.
The actual cause of the correlation are often third or fourth
properties influencing the two currently charted. Still the human
mind works differently and projects on the viewed data alone.
- Social Adaption
- How do you minimize risks in life? In knowing details of
developments and the rules they follow. How do you maximize
profits in life? In knowing details of developments and the
rules they follow. You want to the project an expected
reaction to an action of yourself. People hunt for rules
and associated early characteristics that point to them
even before seeing them happening. Now what's an early
observeable characteristic?
- Examples, Series and Exceptions
- Count up examples - both experienced and by hearsay. Do you
set them as series with a common cause? Do you set some of them
as exceptions not belonging to the series? Why? Do see common
attributions correlated within the parts in the example set?
What is a "hidden example"?
- Good Prejudices
- Are prejudices a good thing or bad thing? What means higher
probabilities in correlation to observed characteristic? How
much time do you spend on average to get to know a person
crossing your way while shopping? Can a neighbour in a room
present a hazard? Do you part the guests in a room into
higher and lower probabilities? So do you know them all? Always?
- Family Bonds
- At a family procedure - do you hate it to be compared to your
brother and cousins? Are people comparing you more quickly to
those with whom you have been raised together? What about
school mates that you did play with but which have found to
be guilty of some crime a while later? Perhaps even done while
you knew him day to day?
|